Strategy-A
|
Strategy-A
System Description
The Strategy-A system provides the user access to the material
selection decisions and decision logic of a domain expert in
evaluation of steels exposed to sour pipeline environments. The system
also embodies information from other sources such as published
literature on lab and plant experience related to pipeline service.
The expert system is integrated with a Paradox database through the
Strategy-A interface so as to facilitate storage of historical data.
Pipeline applications typically utilize welded construction of low
to moderate strength steels. They also contain hydrocarbon media under
pressure (which often contain H2S and CO2 with low pH).
Typical pipeline environments and the process of evaluating steels for
service in such environments in Strategy are represented in terms of
modular tasks described below:
- Ranking of the pipeline environment in terms of severity from a
stand point of hydrogen cracking to determine an Environmental
Severity Factor (ESF) for HIC, SSC and SOHIC. Pipeline environments
typically feature weak to moderate acidity solutions formed by a
combination of H2S and CO2 with water. The acid
environment promotes corrosion and the H2S enhances
absorption of hydrogen into steel. Hydrogen flux in steels and
associated cracking severity increases with decreasing pH and
increasing H2S content.
The Strategy-A system determines an environmental severity
ranking for pipeline environments in terms of these factors on an
interval scale of 1 to 10. A typical dialog box used in Strategy
to accept user input is shown in the figure below. The program
computes the pH using the acid gas partial pressures and the
bicarbonates using relationships given by Crolet. The severity is
determined as a function of pH, H2S and temperature.
Effective dehydration, persistence of oil phase and chemical
inhibition affect the severity of hydrogen charging and therefore
that of HIC and SSC. Dehydration generally works to reduce
corrosion and hydrogen charging by minimizing the presence of
liquid water in the system. Similarly, both the oil phase and
chemical inhibition act as a corrosion resisting barrier between
steel and corrosive environment. This step ultimately leads to the
determination of an environmental severity factor (ESF).
- Ranking of steels based on material parameters such as
composition, micro structure, heat treatment, strength/hardness and
material form to determine a material resistance factor (MRF)
representing a steel's resistance to HIC, SSC and SOHIC. The
Strategy-A system uses a combination of 15 parameters to determine
individual material ranks that represent the material's resistance
to HIC, SSC and SOHIC. User input to the system can be accessed
through the databases (previously stored data) or can be specified
interactively through the material dialog box shown below
Heuristic rules gleaned from literature and domain expertise to
make judgments about resistance of a specific material to HIC,
SOHIC and SSC in a specific environment. Each cracking phenomena
has a set of parameters that play a critical role in determining
material resistance. For example, for HIC resistance, the
following parameters are important:
- Product form (hot-rolled plate or pipe, forging,
casting etc.)
- Heat treatment (as-rolled, annealed, normalized or
quenched tempered)
- Micro structure (centerline segregation,
ferrite/pearlite banding, minor banding, no banding)
- Plate thickness and yield strength
- Inclusion morphology
- De-oxidation practice (Si-Al killed, Si-killed,
Ca-treated)
- Sulfur Very low <0.002%
Low 0.002 - 0.01%
Medium 0.011 - 0.02% High > 0.02%
- Phosphorus Low 0.01%
High >0.1%
- Carbon Very Low 0.1%
Low 0.11 - 0.15%
Medium 0.16 - 0.2% High > 0.2%
Other material compositional factors include Copper, Manganese
and Calcium. Copper levels are linked to improved material
performance in non-cyanide, medium pH environments. Similarly,
high Manganese (> 1.2) can adversely affect the inclusion
morphology. Calcium treatment is linked to Ca/S ratio as also the
deoxidation practice used in making the steel. Fully killed
steels, which can have elongated inclusion clusters can benefit
from proper Ca treatment.
All these compositional elements affect HIC resistance such that
increasing levels of these elements typically reduce HIC
resistance of both pipeline and plate steels. Parameters affecting
SOHIC resistance are,
- Sulfur content
- micro structure
- HAZ hardness
- operating stress ratio
Parameters affecting SSC resistance in Strategy are,
- Weld and base-metal hardness
- operating stresses
- minimum operating temperature
- Normalization of the environmental and material ranks to assess
the relative suitability of a given steel to a given environment. In
this step, the system compares the extent of corrosive severity of
the environment to the resistance of the material from steps 1 and
2. An ESF higher than MRF for any of the three phenomena (HIC, SOHIC
or SSC) would indicate a situation where the material will have to
be subjected to laboratory evaluation and possibly replaced prior to
continued use in the environment.
- Assessment of reliability of continued use of a specific piece of
pipeline equipment and material through determination of a Crack
Growth Factor (CGF) on an interval scale of 1-10, determined as a
function of the following parameters:
- Primary and residual stresses
- Stress relief
- Toughness
- flaw size
- Stress concentration factor
- Age of equipment
- Weld joint geometry
- Shape factor for cracks
The CGF is determined to provide the end-user a vehicle to assess
relative crack growth potential between different types of pipeline
equipment and to pin-point areas of concern.
The ESF, CGF and the MRF together will allow the user to determine
the usability of a material under a given set of conditions. The CGF
and the ESF are to be treated as severity factors, meaning lower
values for these rankings are preferable. A lower ESF indicates an
environment of lower severity. Similarly, a lower CGF indicates a more
reliable piece of equipment. The MRF for HIC, SOHIC and SSC determined
by Strategy represents material resistance, hence, a larger MRF
indicates a less susceptible material. A flow chart depicting the
different reasoning modules and their inter-relationships in the
Strategy-A system is shown below
 Top |